convinced that the arrangement that there has been made for that
hire the
and
Julie's services on there
and some principle that the scheme to Wollen.
the Interpreters occasions will be prepared - agreement made for that the cost of the Interpretation
" purpose is a desirable that payment by the Rule in
a
one
as
ought to have
been effected. &
question as if
Zugen which appear to me
to understand it rightly not further explanation there
only is the interpreter's payment in civil cases.
between on the Suitors beg
rule,
way of fees instead of on the Government in itself, perhaps of
hit in cost. and
Efficiency
Criminal cases
the
remuneration for this fact of though mixed by the
his duties also in thrown
a
ordinary
the suitor in civil cases; for the amount
I can express myself satisfied of fair to be taken in the manner latter must be regulated,
with it. It throws the
interpreter's payment,
civil cases, on the suitors
hardly an
to suffice for
the entire payment of
the
Civil Suits.
Should the
231
view which I have taken
of this rule be incorrect I shall be happy to have
my
errors.
in the form of per in cash or salary for all his duties. pressed by
on the Public. This is far from a measure of doubtful expediency in French, but;
the Supreme Court and Legislature Commit
to
Law
As
or,
in the worst, if he were paid in part by fee
impression such as you
Explanation
salary for his actions
may
think proper to
4
the criminal cases,
the
effect me
5
duly fixed fees in the civil cases
Interpreter is to be repaid sufficient reason for adopting world to proportionally left.
to act without any
fees it in the present instance
whatever, which implies
But it appears also that
no fees
are allowed in Criminal cases, a actions In Matters
that his remuneration
of were laws. II Allow
=
cominced that the arrance hat there mont made for that
hi the
an
Julies services on there
an som primi Hat the seeme to Wollen.
the Intepuitis occasions will be depared -agement made for that the cool of the Ixtepectio
" purpose is a desirable that pumpern by the Aule in
a
one
ao
ght have
been effected. &
guntion Ash if
Zugen which appear to me
understand it rightly not farther cxplanation thre
only is the interpreters payment in teil cases.
theen on the Suiters beg
rule,
way of fees instead of on the Government in itself, perhaps of
hit in gost. and
Affediency
Criminal cases
the
remanation for this fact of though mixielly by the
fis duties also in thrown
a
ordinary
the suitor in avil cases; for the amount
I can cxpuse myself satisfied of fus to to laken in the Madinan latter must be dugulakes,
with it. It throws the
iikepuchi's payment,
civil carce, on the suitors
htt an
to suffice for
the entire payment of
the
Ceil Sisters.
Should the
231
view which I have taken
ofthis rule be mccoirect I thall be happy to have
mey
ennenres.
in the form of per inched of Sabupaten for all his duties. ressened by
on the Public. This is fartaf a masure of doubtful soutiful Experiency in french, but;
the Supreme Court and Lepilekis Commit
to
Lav
As
or,
in the worst, if he une faid in part by fee
impression sucks
as you
Explanation
salary for his Catons
may
think proper to
4
the criminal cases,
the
affed me
5
dult frend pes in the civil cases
Interpreter is to be repieced sufficient mason pradopting world to peoportionally lef.
to act without any
fees it in the furent intance
whatever, whind implies
But it appears also Hats
no sus
are allound in Crimesid
superation cases, a actions In Maches
that his remineration
of were laws. II Alour
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.